Learn how Sqyro complies with ABA Model Rules for technology in legal practice
Most legal AI tools don't specify which ABA Model Rules they address. Sqyro explicitly designs around Rule 1.6(c) (technology competence), Rule 1.18 (prospective client protection), and Rule 5.4 (fee-sharing restrictions) — with specific architectural controls for each. This isn't a compliance checkbox — it's built into the platform design.
289+ RLS policies, AES-256 encryption, hash-chained audit logs satisfy the duty of technology competence
Intake and lead data are subject to the same per-attorney isolation as active client data
Attorney matching never considers billing amounts, case values, referral fees, or client wealth
Yes, when implemented correctly. ABA Model Rules permit technology assistance as long as attorneys maintain oversight. Sqyro's propose-and-confirm pattern, adversarial document review, and comprehensive audit trails ensure full compliance with Rules 1.1, 1.6(c), and 5.3.
No. Sqyro's matching engine is specifically designed for ABA Model Rule 5.4 compliance — it never uses billing amounts, case values, referral fee percentages, or client wealth in scoring. Only professional competence factors are considered.
Track leads from first contact to signed engagement
Understand why AI-native platforms outperform legacy tools with AI add-ons
Understand how Sqyro's AI keeps the attorney in control of every decision