Zero Hallucinations — Every Citation Sourced from Real Case Law
Understand how Sqyro eliminates AI hallucinations in legal research
Understand how Sqyro eliminates AI hallucinations in legal research
ChatGPT and Claude can fabricate case citations that sound real but don't exist — attorneys have been sanctioned for filing AI-generated fake citations. Harvey.ai uses retrieval-augmented generation but relies on third-party APIs. Sqyro owns and operates a 10.7M-opinion legal corpus on dedicated hardware, ensuring every citation is sourced from a real court opinion — the same verified court data that Westlaw and LexisNexis index.
Sqyro queries 10.7M real court opinions — not a language model's training data
Click any citation to read the full opinion, verify the holding, and check treatment
Know whether your authority has been overruled, distinguished, or followed — from real court data
Generic AI tools like ChatGPT can fabricate citations — attorneys have been sanctioned for this. Sqyro eliminates this risk entirely by sourcing every citation from a self-hosted corpus of 10.7M real court opinions. If Sqyro cites it, the case exists.
ChatGPT generates text from training data and can produce plausible but fake citations. Sqyro queries a self-hosted database of 10.7M verified court opinions, 76.4M citation relationships, and 19.8M searchable chunks — the same real court records that Westlaw indexes.
No. Unlike generic AI tools, Sqyro sources every citation from verified court records. Every case Sqyro cites is real, with direct links to the full opinion text for attorney verification.
Self-hosting eliminates dependency on third-party APIs that could hallucinate, rate-limit, or shut down. Sqyro's corpus runs on a dedicated server with 128GB RAM and dual NVMe storage — we control the data, the search, and the results.
Learn how Sqyro complies with ABA Model Rules for technology in legal practice
Track leads from first contact to signed engagement
Understand why AI-native platforms outperform legacy tools with AI add-ons